Currency Wars? & The Garment Industry!

Economics is aptly called the Dismal Science. After all, not many studies can achieve absolute boredom, total depression, and complete confusion while simultaneously engendering unrestrained fear.

Truly economic textbooks and articles should be treated the same way as cigarettes packs, with a large notice on the cover

Reading this can be injurious to your health

Don’t say I did not warn you.

The experts are telling us that the U.S. and the China are about to enter into a currency war, by implementing conflicting policies, which may well have ruinous effects on the global economy. This is not exactly true. The reality is that both the United States and China are implementing identical policies, which may well have ruinous effects on the global economy.

China and the U.S. have joined together, albeit unintentionally, to solve their structural economic problems by devaluing their currencies and by buying massive amounts of U.S. government debt. Having created this accidental Sino-American strategy, each is accusing the other of acting unfairly.

The China Case: Chinese economic growth is based on export trade. Marxist rhetoric notwithstanding, China operates a classic, beggar-thy-neighbor mercantile trade policy, importing raw materials and exporting manufactured goods. Much like 18th century Britain and France, China subsidizes their exports of manufactured good while restricting imports. It is not by accident that the world’s largest garment exporter also maintains one of the worlds higher tariff barriers restricting garment imports.

The key to China’s mercantile policy is their ability undervalue their currency This serves to reduce the price of their exports while at the same time raising the price of imports. In this regard, as any Asian garment exporter will tell you, China has been very successful — actually too successful. China has a problem. They have built up this enormous pile of U.S. dollars which now sits there doing nothing. Actually, worse their excessive currency reserves are now causing increasing disruption not only to their neighbors but to their own economy as well

The Chinese government cannot use the money in China because they first would have to convert dollars into Chinese currency which would automatically revalue the RMB against the dollar. Nor can they use the money to buy overseas assets. Ironically, while a billion dollars will buy a great deal, a trillion dollars will buy little or nothing because the things you would want to buy — Microsoft, Exxon, Boeing etc — are not for sale. In fact the only home for a trillion dollars is Government debt which is why China now is the world’s largest foreign holder of U.S. government bonds.

The greater problem is the need to pay Chinese exporters — actually the exporter’s bankers ­— for all the foreign currency they receive, without converting those dollars to RMB. The Chinese solution has been to quarantine the money — take the dollars from the banks and replace the dollars with Chinese RMB denominated bonds at the official, inflated U.S. dollar rate.

Here is the real killer. Issuing government bonds is the same as printing money which is very inflationary. Calculating the value of the bonds at their inflated U.S dollar rate is the same as printing cheap money which makes the whole process even more inflationary. The result is what economists term demand-pull inflation — a case of too much money chasing to few products and investment opportunities — where prices, particularly asset prices such as stocks and property rise out of proportion to their real value.

To counteract the move towards inflation, the Chinese government has tried a number of monetary policies, the latest being increasing interest rates. The logic here, is that by raising the cost of money, people will borrow less. As we will see below, therein lies the next and greater problem

The U.S. Case: The U.S. is in poor economic shape. Unemployment is high. Banks are afraid to lend money to anybody but the largest AAA rated corporations, who do not need to borrow because they are already sitting on huge piles of cash. To make matters worse, the U.S. Government cannot pump money into the economy in the form of infrastructure projects which would lead to increased job opportunities, because this is not politically feasible.

Enter the Federal Reserve (the U.S. central bank) which has embarked on a policy of Quantitative Easing — the Federal Reserve Bank buying U.S. government and other bonds — which translates as printing money—big time. The logic here is that Quantitative Easing will lower the value of the U.S. dollar, which will reduce the price of exports while at the same time raising the price of imports. (where have we heard that before) while at the same time reducing long term interest rates which will make additional funds available to ease the flow of borrowing

The point is that the U.S. and China have joined together to create monetary policies based on depreciating the dollar and the RMB while buying large amounts of U.S. government debt.

As I warned you at the outset — absolute boredom, total depression, and complete confusion while simultaneously engendering unrestrained fear.

That was the introduction.

Here comes the fun part.

Originally, China’s pile of U.S. dollars was the result of rising exports to the U.S. However, the new Sino-American joint initiative has brought a new dimension which makes the problem far more serious than either side recognized.

Quantitative Easing provides U.S. banks with additional funds to lend out. However providing additional funds does not necessarily mean banks will lend out those funds, particularly at a time when the only safe borrowers — the major corporations — are already awash with cash. Furthermore, even if the banks were willing to lend out those funds it does not follow those loans will go to U.S. based investments. Remember U.S. banks are all global operations. When you think about it, at a time when the U.S. economy is stagnating; U.S. interest rates are heading down; and the U.S. dollar is heading down, the U.S. might no be a good risk. Better to go outside the U.S. and put the money in a country with a large and rising economy where interest rates are rising and the value of the currency is rising. Under the circumstances, what better place than to put this new money than China?

All of which leads us to a perfect circle.

U.S. dollars flow into China

China returns the U.S. dollar surpluses to the U.S.

U.S. Banks lend these U.S. dollars for investments in China

U.S. dollars flow into China. . .

So the Chinese pile of U.S. dollars grows.

Collateral Damage: Innocent bystanders victims

If this were a problem involving only the U.S. and China, we could all relax and watch the two giants duke it out. Unfortunately, the Sino-American joint policy seriously impacts on everyone else.

The other industrialized countries notably Japan and the countries of the EU which also rely on exports have seen their currencies move up making their exports less competitive.

Developing countries that produce light consumer products such as garments find it increasingly more difficult to compete with China because their currencies are forced upward in comparison with the both the Chinese RMB and the U.S. dollar. At the same time many of these countries have seen tremendous inflow of hot money — people and companies looking to make a fast buck by taking advantage of countries with strong economies, high interest rates, and upward moving currencies.

This situation cannot continue indefinitely. There must be a solution

Moving towards a solution: For the past month, neither the Chinese nor the U.S. have been able to work effectively towards a solution. Both sides were deeply involved in their respective elections.

Regrettably, during political campaigns, rhetoric and posturing become the order of the day.

This is where both the Chinese and U.S. Governments stand up and say This is not my fault. The problem is with the other guy who has selfishly put his narrow national interests above the well being of the rest of the world.

Chinese Solo: If only the United would raise their interest rates.

U.S. Solo: If only China would limit the size of their foreign currency reserves

Duet: We must all work together to force the selfish ones to change.

While the U.S. elections are over, we must now wait for the Chinese leaders to elect their new leaders before serious consideration can be given to the world economy.

The end of the problem: Fortunately the problem will be solved, simply because the current situation is unsustainable.

China is beginning to face demand pull inflation which will cause serious economic disruption and hardship to the people with lower income.

quantitative easing has added two new problems to the Chinese dilemma.

1. Where in the past the Chinese had only to keep parity with a stable currency, they must now maintain their undervalued exchange rate against a currency which itself is being devalued.

2. Between now and June 2011, the Federal reserve plans to buy bonds totaling $600 billion. This is equal to 100% of the U.S. governments needs to turnover its debt. This removes any leverage the Chinese might have had to affect U.S. policy.

The Chinese government is running out of options.

As the pile grows higher, the problem becomes increasingly more serious. As of October 2010, the Chinese foreign currency pile totaled about $2.6 trillion — equal to 53% of China’s GDP. Of this amount $1.7 trillion is denominated in U.S. dollars. That pile is growing at the rate of a $1 billion a day.

China Foreign Exchange Holdings

2010

2011

2012

Total Foreign Exchange

PCT

$2,650,000,000,000

$3,010,000,000,000

$3,375,000,000,000

US$ Holdings

65%

$1,722,500,000,000

$1,956,500,000,000

$2,193,750,000,000

EURO Holdings

26%

$689,000,000,000

$782,600,000,000

$877,500,000,000

UK Pounds

5%

$132,500,000,000

$150,500,000,000

$168,750,000,000

Other

4%

$106,000,000,000

$120,400,000,000

$135,000,000,000

Foreign Exchange PCT GDP

53.0%

55.0%

56.6%

Potential Exchange Loss US$

20%

$344,500,000,000

$391,300,000,000

$438,750,000,000

Exchange Loss PCT GDP US$

6.9%

7.1%

7.4%

Potential Exchange Loss US$

30%

$516,750,000,000

$586,950,000,000

$658,125,000,000

Exchange Loss PCT GDP US$

10.3%

10.7%

11.0%

The question is no longer how the Chinese can safely extricate themselves from this mess. There is no “safe” way. There will be a loss. The only question just how big . According to current estimates, the Chinese RMB is undervalued by 20%. Should the RMB be revalued by 20%, Chinese will take a loss of over $300 billion, provided they act this year. Next year the figure rises to nearly $400 billion. Furthermore, this does not take into consideration the effects of the sale itself. Money is a commodity, the greater the supply, the lower the price. At the end of the day, the loss might well be closer to 30%.

Currency Wars? & The Garment Industry! The situation is unstable. What is true today might not be true tomorrow (actually it might not even be true today). As I see it, there are two possibilities

1 Despite the serious nature of the problem, China may well solve their problems while still maintaining their competitive edge. Personally, I would not bet on that.

2 China’s solution may not allow them to maintain their competitive edge, or worse they might not be able to solve their problems at all. Personally, I would not bet on that either.

For us garmentos, the smart move is to hope for the best but to take out insurance against the worst. I think increased diversification away from China might still be the best move

Share
This entry was posted in Articles, China-Greater China and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

76 Responses to Currency Wars? & The Garment Industry!

  1. Izzykonto says:

    Beatiful blog! Where had you get this layout?

  2. overdrawn dauphin splay brawley depravity severity deicide mark mesterbein

  3. outstanding web-site. Keep doing

  4. Good post. Nice perspective and i also wish to appreciate intriguing and tips. Thank you!

  5. Some genuinely nice and utilitarian info on this website , as well I conceive the style and design has got excellent features.

  6. I used to be wondering should anyone ever considered changing the layout of your blog? Its well written. I love what youve reached say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect to it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for just having 1 or 2 images. You may could space out better?

  7. Hey outstanding post on Currency Wars? & The Garment Industry! » David Birnbaum's Blog jersey shore season 4 ronnie fights mike.

  8. Woh I enjoy your content , saved to my bookmarks ! .

  9. Abdul Axford says:

    I love your wordpress design, where would you obtain it from?

  10. Excellent study, I just passed this onto a colleague who was performing slightly study on that. And he actually purchased me lunch because I discovered it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch!

  11. Strange this post is totaly irrelevant to the search query I entered on the internet nonetheless it was listed on the first page.

  12. brainwave says:

    Spot on with this write-up, I really assume this website needs rather more consideration. I’ll most likely be once more to learn way more, thanks for that info.

  13. It is best to take part in a contest for one of the best blogs on the web. I will recommend this site!

  14. Spot on with this write-up, I actually suppose this web site wants much more consideration. I’ll in all probability be once more to read far more, thanks for that info.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>