Hijacking the Global Garment Export Industry — China and her Accomplices

2010 had but one country winner:China

There seems little doubt that in 2010 China’s U.S. market share will breach the 40% barrier.Good times, bad time, China continues to move inexorably upwards, while at the same time China’s main competitors’ market shares are either stagnating or declining[i].If this trend continues China will takeover the entire industry, leaving the rest of us the bits her factories cannot or do not want to produce

The questions are why and what can we do to stop China?

The answer we receive does not make sense.We are told it is all about price: China maintains its dominant position because illegal government subsidies allow Chinese factories to export garments at FOB prices below real costs. Critics argue that if the Chinese government were forced to remove its subsidies, China’s FOB prices would rise which would allow other garment exporting countries to compete more effectively against their Chinese counterparts.

Like most half-truths, the unfair-price-advantage theory is 50% accurate and 50% nonsense.It is certainly true that the Chinese Government does subsidize Chinese factories.It is also true that until very recently prices for made-in-China garments had been falling[ii].

However, the fact is China’s FOB prices have begun to rise, erodingany price advantage may have had [iii], yet China’s market share continues to rise.More revealing is the fact that China’s market share continues to rise even in such :”commodity” products such asT-shirts where their FOB prices are at a substantial premium to world average.

The answer to the question why, lies not in price but rather in product and product mix.Ironically, China’s competitors compete with one another. They donot compete with China.

U.S. garment imports are dominated by four big basic commodity products which account for 45% of all U.S. garment imports.Of these big-four,two — cotton T-shirts and cotton trousers — account for 36% of all garment imports while the second two —woven shirts and underwear — account for 9%.These four products dominate the exports of nine of the 10largest U.S. garment suppliers[iv] and this is the area where they compete.China is the only exception with the big two accounting for only 26% and the second tier two accounting for only 5

Unlike the other countries, China’s garment industry is diversified.Exports of the big four products, while important do not dominate China’s garment exports.While the other garment exporting countries are busy fighting one another for market share in the big four commodity products, they are leaving China alone to dominate the other products.

China’s product mix:

As of year to date October 2010 U.S. imports from China totaled$23.7 billion dollars.Of that amount $3.8 billion (16%) was divided among 40 products in which China’s U.S. market share was between 67%-98% giving China a virtual monopoly.A further $7.3 billion (31%) was divided among 24 products in which China’s U.S. market share was between 50%-65% giving China market dominance.Altogether 54% of Chinese garment exports are in products where U.S. imports are now controlled by China.

Imagine you are in the sweater business and wish to import women’s wool sweaters.You can go to China (87% market share).You can go to Italy (6% market share) which is a great alternative, if you are Giorgio Armani or Ralph Lauren.After that you have U.K. (1% market share) followed by Peru (0.6% market share) which produces great alpaca but little sheep wool. Let’s face it, for all practical purposes your choice is China, China or China.What is true for women’s wool sweaters is equally true for cotton sweaters, wool knit blouses, women’s wool suits, men’s synthetic jackets, and 36 other products.For these 40 products It does not matterif prices rise substantially.You have to stay with China because no other country supplies your product.

Some may argue that much of this advantage is due to China’s access to indigenous raw material, particularly silk (77% U.S. market share) and linen/ramie (82% U.S. market share).

However, this is not the case.India produces silk but holds only a 4% U.S. market share.Thailand is world famous for silk but accounts for less than 1% U.S. market share.

The same holds true for other-vegetable-fibers (OVF) which includes linen, ramie and related fibers.China monopolizes this market using ramie.However, other, far better fibers are grown throughout the world: Hemp—Canada and France, jute—India and Bangladesh, Sisal—Mexico, the Caribbean, Kenya and Tanzania, and Henequen—Mexico.These OVF fibers exist, but none of these countries are making the effort necessary to compete in the billion dollar OVF garment market.

Wool is the most important example. Wool garments is a $3+ billion export business. Most importantly, it is a fiber that China like everyone else must import.Nevertheless, if you want to import wool garments you have very few choices. You can go to China (55% market share).After that you have Italy (12% market share), Mexico (5% market share), Canada (3% market share), Vietnam (3% market share).For men’s suits and jackets both Mexico and Canada offer good quality products at very competitive prices.For everything else, once again you are left with China, China, andChina.

China either controls or virtually monopolizes U.S.imports of 64 products, which as of the year to date October 2010 had a total FOB in excess of $21 billion.This is one basis of China’s dominance of the global garment industry.

The second basis is product quality.Why would a customer pay China $3.88 for a cotton T-shirt when the same cotton T-shirt is available from Pakistan for $2.46, from El Salvador for $1.69 and from Honduras at $1.57? The answer is that they are not the same T-shirts.The made-in-Pakistan, made-in-El Salvador and made in Honduras T-shirts are basic commodities competing with Bangladesh, Sub Saharan Africa and other garment export industries based in the least-developed countries, while the made-in-China T-shirt is a quality fashion item.The nomenclature for tariff purposes is the same, but the actual products are very different.

Stopping China

China maintains its dominance, not through unfair or illegal currency manipulation or other underhanded subsidies, but rather because the rest of us — China’s potential competitors —have walked away from China’s main export products.It is far easier to make cheap T-shirts and 5-pocket jeans than wool sweaters and down jackets.The orders are larger, workers require fewer skills and the capital investment much smaller; which is precisely why every country in the world is competing to produce these products.

Everyone competes to make the easy stuff with the result that the price keeps on falling.However, the profit is in the difficult stuffwhich we have all left to China. It is for us, to develop our industry to compete effectively on a product by product basis with China.We have no alternative.

If indeed China does succeed in hijacking the global garment industry, do not look to blame others.We have only ourselves to blame.We are all China’s accomplices.


[i]

Top 10 U.S. Garment Suppliers:Market Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

YTD 10-10

China

25.9%

30.8%

32.0%

37.2%

39.5%

Vietnam

4.5%

5.9%

7.3%

8.0%

8.2%

Indonesia

5.1%

5.4%

5.6%

6.1%

6.2%

Bangladesh

4.1%

4.2%

4.8%

5.4%

5.5%

Mexico

7.4%

6.1%

5.6%

5.4%

4.9%

India

4.4%

4.3%

4.3%

4.5%

4.4%

Honduras

3.4%

3.4%

3.6%

3.2%

3.3%

Cambodia

3.0%

3.3%

3.3%

3.0%

3.0%

El Salvador

2.0%

2.0%

2.1%

2.1%

2.3%

Pakistan

2.0%

2.0%

2.1%

2.1%

2.0%

[ii]

Made in China FOB Prices

2006

2007

2008

2009

YTD 10-10

All Garments

$2.85

$2.83

$2.94

$2.73

$2.69

Cotton T-shirts

$4.36

$4.74

$5.07

$4.04

$3.88

Cotton Trousers

$6.22

$6.66

$6.73

$5.39

$4.98

M&B Woven Shirts

$5.29

$5.91

$6.49

$6.11

$6.05

Underwear

$1.20

$1.26

$1.35

$1.08

$0.99

[iii]

Made in China FOB Prices Premium/Discount to Average from All U.S Suppliers

2006

2007

2008

2009

YTD 10-10

All Garments

-10.4%

-10.6%

-6.7%

-7.9%

-6.8%

Cotton T-shirts

54.3%

64.3%

79.6%

48.8%

44.7%

Cotton Trousers

5.5%

16.7%

19.7%

2.8%

-1.8%

M&B Woven Shirts

-7.6%

-0.8%

2.8%

1.6%

3.1%

Underwear

18.5%

25.7%

34.1%

5.9%

0.8%

[iv]

Top 10 U.S. Garment Suppliers:Four Major Products:Market Share

338/339

347/348

340/640

352/652

Big 2

Total 4

World

19%

17%

4%

5%

36%

45%

China

12%

13%

3%

2%

26%

31%

Vietnam

26%

16%

4%

3%

42%

49%

Indonesia

27%

13%

6%

2%

40%

47%

Bangladesh

10%

39%

12%

5%

49%

66%

Mexico

14%

41%

3%

2%

56%

61%

India

26%

11%

7%

9%

37%

53%

Honduras

33%

3%

5%

17%

37%

58%

Cambodia

29%

28%

1%

3%

57%

61%

El Salvador

31%

5%

3%

21%

37%

61%

Pakistan

41%

23%

1%

5%

64%

70%

Share
This entry was posted in Articles, China-Greater China and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

196 Responses to Hijacking the Global Garment Export Industry — China and her Accomplices

  1. Thanks for these pointers. One thing I also believe is credit cards giving a 0% rate often attract consumers along with zero rate of interest, instant approval and easy on the web balance transfers, nevertheless beware of the top factor that will void your 0% easy street annual percentage rate and to throw anybody out into the poor house in no time.

  2. Pingback: free play music

  3. Pingback: i like reading

  4. wanita hamil says:

    I’m clearly ponder over it and also like mastering much more about this field. When likely, as you gain knowledge,always keep writing and happy blogging!

  5. This is really interesting, You’re very skilled blogger. Ive joined your feed and appearance toward seeking more of your great post. Also, I have shared your internet site during my internet sites!

  6. Found this on Bing and I’m happy I did. Well written article.

  7. I am not rattling wonderful with English but I come up this really easygoing to read .

  8. phone card says:

    Thanks a lot for being my personal teacher on this niche. My spouse and i enjoyed your article quite definitely and most of all appreciated how you really handled the aspect I widely known as controversial. You are always incredibly kind to readers really like me and help me in my existence. Thank you.

  9. Great function, generally get pleasure from reading your content.

  10. It’s actually a great and useful piece of information. I am satisfied that you simply shared this helpful information with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.

  11. Found this on Bing and I’m glad I did. Well written article.

  12. WONDERFUL Post.thanks for share..more wait .. …

  13. I was seeking a post like this. Really refreshing take on the information. Thanks a lot.

  14. Yet another great information on Hijacking the Global Garment Export Industry — China and her Accomplices » David Birnbaum's Blog mike the situation fights ronnie.

  15. Velma Katnik says:

    Amazing plus an highly intriguing publish to stumble from about this enormous site! Never ever create a number of replies but now my spouse and i couldnt i really could not withstand ..

  16. Cody Koss says:

    Thanks a lot regarding revealing this particular effortlessly us you actually know what you are talking around! Bookmarked. Please furthermore seek advice from my personal web site Equals). We might possess a website link trade design in between people!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>